Proponents of Shaq’s position contend that he is within his rights to run his companies anyway he sees appropriate and to enforce certain policies.
His actions, in their eyes, are a reaction to the “wokeness” movement’s intrusion into mainstream culture.
However, others who stand by Clooney’s side see the whole thing as an unfair and overly coercive reaction to lawful social activism.
They contend that we should embrace, not reject, Clooney’s opinions, which often revolve on social justice and human rights.
This unexpected and perhaps disastrous public eviction from a prominent restaurant is something that George Clooney is dealing with.
The public’s perception of Clooney and his advocacy work might be affected by his participation in such a scandal, given his charisma and dedication to several social issues.
