Were participating in the crime as accomplices, so he would be unable to lawfully use the defense if he claimed he was acting on their advice.
Prosecutors intended to point out that Trump used his remarks to commit other crimes, such as using false statements to undermine a government function,
Obstruct an official proceeding, and harm the right to vote, even if he claimed that he was only exercising his First Amendment rights when he challenged the election.
“The Office was cognizant of Mr. Trump’s free speech rights during the investigation and would not have brought a prosecution.
If the evidence indicated he had engaged in mere political exaggeration or rough-and-tumble politics,” the report said. “The conduct of Mr. Trump and co-conspirators,
However, went well beyond speaking their minds or contesting the election results through our legal system.” Several interviews with alleged “fake electors” who allegedly attempted.
