They saw his choice as representative of a concerning pattern in which professional cooperation may be overshadowed by personal prejudices, creating an atmosphere of exclusion rather than inclusion.
Many also stress how important it is to promote different perspectives in Hollywood, especially those of women and people of color like Goldberg who have battled valiantly for inclusion in the field.
On the other hand, some of Costner’s supporters support his freedom to choose his partners in accordance with his own beliefs.
They contend that regardless of the situation, artists need to be allowed to choose how they want to spend their professional lives and shouldn’t be forced to collaborate with people they don’t agree with.
These advocates assert that the Oscars are intended to honor cinematic accomplishments, because bringing people together who have different viewpoints might take away from the goal of the event.
The aftermath of this event has spurred media conversations on how celebrity interactions are changing, especially in a time when narratives can be quickly shaped by popular opinion.
Industry experts are analyzing the ramifications of these choices, speculating that the gap between stars could represent more profound cultural divisions inside Hollywood that transcend individual concerns.
