Since his claim was rejected by the Reading employment tribunal. ‘Very large advantage’ and ‘favourable treatment’ were what Clifford claimed to be receiving.
Employment Judge Paul Housego dismissed the complaint, stating that “active employees may receive pay increases, but inactive employees do not,
Is a difference, but is not, in my judgement, a detriment caused by something arising from disability.” Since the payouts have been at a set amount since April 6, 2013,
Which is already ten years ago, and may stay that way, the issue is that the benefit of being an inactive employee on the Plan is not substantial enough.
